Thoughts on Obamacare

For now, I’m sticking to my guns.  I’m calling the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare a victory for Americans, and I’m proud to call it “Obamacare” (rather than Romneycare, which would better reflect history).  But it’s not entirely clear how ACA’s implementation will ultimately affect us all. Here’s some potential pitfalls:

  • As insurance reform, rather than healthcare reform, it continues to fund the bloated, cash-sucking US private health insurance industry.
  • It’s going to cost us all something. Whether that “something” is more than we’re pumping into health care now, or simply a shifting around of costs isn’t clear.
  • A lot more people will have access to preventative care, but there are not nearly enough primary care physicians available to take care of them due to perverse financial incentives.
  • That’s really about it. That’s the worst I can come up with.

Here are some potential benefits:

  • As insurance reform rather than healthcare reform, it should unify conservatives and liberals. More coverage, but reliance on the public sector. Still waiting for that Kumaya thing, though.
  • It’s going to cost something, but nothing we’re not already paying for.  You think paying for insurance for people is expensive? We already tried not paying for it, and we pay anyway, every time someone wanders into an ER, every time an uninsured diabetic gets another leg chopped off.
  • A lot more people will have access to preventative care.  This may give us the incentive to reform medical education and practice to encourage more primary care docs.
  • It’s a moral victory. It’s not a single payer, and still allows the insurance industry to steal our money, but it makes a statement that as a nation, we believe that the health of our citizens is as important as fighting fires and keeping criminals off the streets.
  • We get to make people buy broccoli. And Brussels sprouts.

Doctors are nervous about this (not the veggies, but the law).  Primary care docs work on narrow margins, tight budgets. The uncertainty created by the reform is destabilizing—will we need to completely restructure our office? Lay people off? Hire more? Cut our salaries? Move to a smaller or larger space?

Ultimately, I’m optimistic.  I think the law is a start, and that we’ll find ways to adjust. Hopefully.

The Right has of course wet itself in rage. They’re doing somersaults trying to explain how Chief Justice Roberts could have “betrayed” them. Some are even promoting armed rebellion. Over a tax. A tax proposed by the Executive Branch, passed by the Legislative Branch, and upheld by the Judicial Branch. So where is the balance of powers problem here? Did all the branches just lose their minds and betray their oaths?

I’m hoping for mental health care parity so these folks can learn that not getting your way is not an excuse to lose your mind.

7 Comments

  1. DLC

     /  June 28, 2012

    Remember, when the ruling goes my way, it’s just, and when it goes your way, it’s unethical judicial activism.

  2. saffronrose

     /  June 29, 2012

    Thank Divine Providence that Mental Health Care Parity showed up in 2001 in California, when my son and I were dx’d with different forms of bipolar disorder! Without it, we’d both be much worse off.

  3. Lady Day

     /  June 29, 2012

    I’m a *little* optimistic, as well. However, here’s an article that raises an interesting point. http://www.thenation.com/blog/168664/justice-robertss-decision-not-cheering

  4. @ Lady Day: I’ve been trying hard to ignore those types of points… Just for a few days. I want to relish the fantasy that we’re inching toward a better society.

    My kids actually like broccoli and most other veggies.

    Now we need to bundle in dental and vision.

  5. The biggest problem is, of course, going halfway. Poison plus anything is poison. (Yeah, I know, not necessarily.)

    The Republicans will of course fight it. And by “fight it”, I mean spam it through so they get over nine thousand votes as proof they’re against it.

    Another plus: The entertainment of watching the usual rogues’ gallery get in on healthcare.

  6. It truly IS a “moral victory” and doing the right thing always feels good. Another good feeling is knowing that my daughter can no longer be denied coverage for her “pre-existing” autism.

    • Does autism come in any other form?

      Comments about “pre-existing conditions” notwithstanding, the problem with Republican propaganda on the law (the potential for abuse, complete with Godwin) is that, quite frankly, any law is prone to abuse. The police could frame someone for murder, but let me be the first to say murder should be a crime.

%d bloggers like this: